New Mexico School Districts Flunk Transparency Tests: Sunshine Review
Print This Post
ONLY ALBUQUERQUE, LAS CRUCES AND LOS LUNAS SCORE WELL
New Mexico school districts earned an overall “F” for information available on their websites according to an analysis conducted by Sunshine Review, a pro-transparency group. The analysis found that 76 of the 89 school districts in the state, including Santa Fe, scored a “D” or lower. Las Cruces, Albuquerque, and Los Lunas Public Schools received New Mexico’s only “B” grades.
Sunshine Review employs a “10 Point Transparency Checklist” to assess state and local government websites on proactive disclosure of government information. The checklist measures content available on government websites against what should be provided. Checklist items include information about budgets, meetings, elected and administrative officials, background checks, audits, contracts, academic performance, public records, and taxes.
“Fabulous news,” says Albuquerque Public Schools spokesperson Monica Armenta. “In January we revamped the APS website. One of our goals was to improve trust by making sure information was easily accessible and timely. The New Mexico Technology Council recently gave us an award [TechEx] for an outstanding contribution to the community through our efforts to provide timely and accurate information. We understand the public’s right to know. Things are better for everyone when information is easy to get to.”
In April, APS Superintendent Winston Brooks received the William S. Dixon First Amendment Freedom Award from the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government.
Bobbie Gutierrez, superintendent of Santa Fe Public Schools, did not dispute the report’s evaluation. “It is timely as we’re in the process of updating our website to make it more user friendly; some of the information identified as “bad” we’re aware of and will be working to correct as we roll out upgrades.”
The Rio Grande Foundation, which sponsors this site, has ongoing a major transparency project focused at public schools. Paul Gessing, President of the Rio Grande Foundation, said this is response to the Sunshine Review’s grading: “Government transparency remains a high profile for the Rio Grande Foundation. To this end, we have been requesting information on payrolls, teacher contracts, and spending for a new website under development by the Rio Grande Foundation, www.newmexicospending.com which is set to release in the next week or so. This process has not been easy as school districts have repeatedly stonewalled and made it very difficult for us to obtain necessary information.”
Sunshine Review is a non-profit organization dedicated to state and local government transparency. Sunshine Review collaborates with individuals and organizations throughout America in the cause of an informed citizenry and a transparent government. Since its inception in 2008, Sunshine Review has analyzed the websites of all 50 states, more than 3,140 counties, 805 cities, and 1,560 school districts.
Posted under Blog.
Tags: Albuquerque Pulbic Schools, Las Cruces Public Schools, Los Lunas Public Schools, Monica Armenta, Paul Gessing, Rio Grande Foundation, Santa Fe Pulbic Schools, Sunshine Reveiw, transparency, Winston Brooks
4 Comments For This Post So Far
Trackbacks
-
New Mexico School Districts Flunk Transparency Tests: Sunshine Review
[...] Read More [...]
-
Errors of Enchantment » New Mexico Schools Flunk Transparency Tests: Sunshine Review
[...] a general ‘F.’ But three districts did quite well and deserve our appreciation. New Mexico Watchdog reports. Posted on July 6, 2010 at 2:31 pm by Jim Scarantino · Permalink In: Uncategorized Tagged [...]












2:48 pm on July 7th, 2010
But maybe not so transparent for non English speaking parents. Unlike some large city urban districts that actually walk the walk of diversity and make their websites multi-lingual.
2:56 pm on July 7th, 2010
I can’t imagine how APS got even a “B”; they must not be asking the right questions.
Ask them how many tax dollars they spent on their, as yet to be justified new board room, and see how far you get.
Or ask, why more than three years after senior APS administrators were involved in felony criminal misconduct; doing NCIC background checks on whistle blower, the evidence has still not been turned over to the DA.
Or ask them why the refuse to be held accountable as role models of the student standards of conduct.
Transparent my ass.