Updated: Obama Stimulus Creates New Congressional Districts and Promotes New Mexico from Banana Republic to Coconut Republic
Print This Post
According to the Obama Administration, the expenditure of $61,000 in federal stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created or saved 25 jobs in New Mexico’s 22nd Congressional District. You read that right: New Mexico’s Twenty-Second Congressional District. (We only have enough population for three congressional districts).
Federal stimulus dollars, according to the Obama Administration, as reported at www.recovery.gov, also created or saved 15.8 jobs in the 35th Congressional Distict (where $8.96 million in stimulus dollars were spent) and 2.7 jobs in NM 00 (which received $731.370).
Other fictional New Mexico Congressional Districts receiving stimulus money were NM 40 (no jobs for $7.96 million), NM 4 (10 jobs created/saved for $4.72 million), NM 13 (5 jobs created for $3.3 million), NM 16 (no jobs for $517,980), NM 9 (no jobs for $100,000), NM 6 (1 job created/saved for $63,199) and the 25th Congressional District that received a mere $6,819.
It’s all right here, the official word from the Obama Administration on the postive effects of nearly a trillion in stimulus spending it is reporting in the Land of Enchantment. Here’s the New Mexico summary page listing over $16 million of spending in New Mexico’s 35th and 40th Congressional Districts…kind of a tip off that something is really amiss. Click the “view all Congressional districts” at the bottom of the table listing five Congressional districts for New Mexico and you’ll be taken to the page listing jobs created/saved and money expended in the ten new Congressional districts for New Mexico created miraculously as the result of the stimulus spending.
This comes on the heels of our report this morning that the Obama Administration claims to have created or saved over 4,800 New Mexico jobs in the space of a few weeks.
Update: Reader David Harris has pointed out (correctly) that the certification for the expenditure of all the stimulus funds going to New Mexico, according to the certification linked on the New Mexico summary page, is Benigno R. Fitial, Governor, Commonwealth of North Mariana Islands. From banana republic to coconut republic, I guess. Amazing what a trillion dollars can do.
Posted under News.
Tags: Jim Scarantino, phantom congressional districts
21 Comments For This Post So Far
Trackbacks
-
Errors of Enchantment » Obama Administration Spends Millions in Nonexistent NM Congressional Districts
[...] in ten New Mexico Congressional districts that do not exist. I repeat: I am not making this up. Read for yourself. Posted on November 16, 2009 at 1:49 pm by Jim Scarantino · Permalink [...]
-
UPDATE: Stimulus Creates Jobs in Non-Existent Congressional Districts
[...] Jim Scarantino at New Mexico Watchdog, who discovered the problems with Recovery.org in his state. This appears to be a nationwide [...]
-
Stimulus Package Gives New Hampshire Three New Congressional Districts
[...] Jim Scarantino at New Mexico Watchdog, who discovered the problems with Recovery.org in his state. This appears to be a nationwide [...]
-
The List Just Keeps on Growing
[...] New Mexico: 10 [...]
-
BREAKING: Obama Recovery Acts Increases W.Va. Congressional Districts by Eight!
[...] Other state and national watchdogs are reporting similar stories, starting with Jim Scarantino at New Mexico Watchdog, which reported 10 additional Congressional [...]
-
Your Guide to the Stimulus District by (Phantom District)
[...] New Mexico Watchdog: 10 [...]
-
Federal stimulus Web site says $14.7 million in aid went to Texas Congressional districts that don’t exist | Texas Watchdog
[...] feds’ curious numbering of districts was uncovered yesterday by New Mexico Watchdog and expanded upon by the Franklin Center for Government and Public [...]
-
The phantom stimulus hits Tennessee
[...] of the flawed data and non-existent Congressional districts broke Monday when a New Mexico watchdog site reported phantom Congressional districts in their state’s Recovery.gov [...]
-
Morning Bell: The Fake Jobs of Obama’s Failed Stimulus | Conservative Principles Now
[...] 57th Congressional District, 35 jobs have been saved or created using $404,340 in stimulus funds. In New Mexico’s 22nd Congressional District, 25 jobs have been saved or created using $61,000…. And in Arizona’s fighting 15th Congressional District, 30 jobs have been saved or created [...]
-
BREAKING: The Pink Flamingo to Run for Congress! : The Pink Flamingo
[...] to the NM Watchdog, the Obama Administration has created nearly 5000 jobs in New Mexico in just a few [...]
-
Watchdog Forces Stimulus Accountability
[...] Center for Government & Public Integrity. Rio Grande Foundation reporter Jim Scarantino exposed the administrations stimulus tracking website, Recovery.gov, for its creation of phantom [...]
-
Federal Stimulus Funds Reportedly Spent In Nonexistent Zip Codes
[...] month, we reported on federal stimulus money credited with creating jobs in nonexistent New Mexico Congressional [...]
-
Stimulus Funds Phantom Zip Codes
[...] month, we reported on federal stimulus money credited with creating jobs in nonexistent New Mexico Congressional [...]
-
Stimulus Funds Reportedly Went to Nonexistent Zip Code Areas
[...] month, we reported on federal stimulus money credited with creating jobs in nonexistent New Mexico Congressional [...]
-
New Mexico Watchdog breaks story on ‘phantom zip codes’ getting stimulus funds
[...] month, we reported on federal stimulus money credited with creating jobs in nonexistent New Mexico Congressional [...]
-
Errors of Enchantment » First there were fake congressional districts; now, fake zip codes
[...] Grande Foundation’s investigative journalist Jim Scarantino found that the Administration had listed several mythical New Mexico congressional districts that had supposedly received stimulus funds. While the Administration dutifully pledged to resolve [...]
-
Recovery.gov Blasts Watchdogs, But Admits Errors and Promises Fix
[...] that “every penny was being tracked” in the stimulus funding. Our latest report follows a November report in which we found the recovery.gov website reporting $26.5 million in stimulus funds going to [...]












10:06 pm on November 16th, 2009
Those extra districts will be voting Obama into the Presidency in 2012 and 2016 and 2020.
4:40 am on November 17th, 2009
I volunteered for him — day after day — and clearly he has put monkeys to preparing this report. It’s a humiliation, but keep up the good work.
1:48 pm on November 17th, 2009
I was hoping to find something big and scandalous here, but there’s not much to see. The New Mexico summary page (linked to above and here: http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency/StateSummaries/Pages/StateSummary.aspx?StateCode=NM) shows that there are not 40 districts, but districts 1,2,3, and 5 or 6 others. Clearly the data has been input incorrectly and needs to be fixed, but that seems to be the extent of the problem. The relative amount of spending in these non-existent districts is minuscule @$20 million when compared to that which was spent in actual New Mexico districts @$1.5 Billion.
In my home state of Utah, it refers to an as-of-yet non-existent 4th congressional district as well as district 00, but the totals for these districts are well within the tolerance of data entry errors.
That being said, I still think the Obama stimulus package was an utter waste of time and money (they repaved a 4-mile stretch of freeway with stimulus money here–a stretch that had been paved–although badly–about 1 or 2 years ago). I also think that it is less that fruitless for Obama Administration to claim that they have any idea how many new jobs they created.
9:40 pm on August 15th, 2010
So, it looks like a recording error on the basis of Zipcodes, or Congressional districts matched to the wrong state — or perhaps, money being spent in New Mexico from a grant or contract or loan to another state.
Is it your allegation that these funds were illegally paid out? Do you know, here several months later, what happened to that money, or to the reporting?