New Mexico: Amber waves of hemp?
Print This Post
But first, let’s dispense with all the Cheech and Chong jokes and I promise this post will not include any lame puns about pot or weed or getting the munchies, etc.
Let’s get the facts out first:
Hemp is not the same thing as marijuana. It is a fiber that is produced by the cannibas family of plants. You cannot smoke hemp. (Well, you could but it would not get you high, just sick.)
The hemp fiber is used to make things like rope, clothing, textiles, lotions and even construction materials such as strengtheners for concrete. Some energy bars include hemp seeds because the seeds are rich in Omega 3s, 6s and 9s.
In countries like Canada, the Ukriane and France, farmers and ranchers grow industrial hemp as a cash crop because
A) it’s easy to grow
B) it doesn’t cost much to maintain or water, and
C) it’s profitable.
For example, in 2008 Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps sold $29 million in hemp-related products.
Okay, but what does this have to do with New Mexico?
Well, state Sen. Cisco McSorley (D-Albuquerque) would like to see the state pass a bill allowing the production of industrial hemp. He thinks it could help farmers and ranchers, who are struggling in the current economy. After all, New Mexico has plenty of land and its climate may be conducive to the growing of hemp because the fiber does not need much water.
I spoke to him a few weeks ago about it:
There is one significant hurdle to overcome though:
The US government outlawed industrial hemp because the fiber comes from that pesky cannabis plant that produces marijuana. Hemp, like pot, contains THC – the chemical compound that makes you high. McSorley told me that the THC content in marijuana is 23 while the THC content in hemp is .01 percent, which means the narcotic effect of hemp is miniscule.
McSorley hopes that if enough states express their desire to grow industrial hemp they could lobby the US government and Attorney General Eric Holder to rescind the ban, as Canada did in 1988.
US House of Representatives member Ron Paul (R-Texas) introduced a bill last year (HR-1866) but it got nowhere. “Members of Congress don’t really care about it,” Paul told CNBC at the time. “They (think), ‘If you vote for hemp, you vote for marijuana. If you vote for marijuana, you vote for hard drugs. And then you’re pro drug.”
On the New Mexico level, perhaps McSorley can make more headway if he can find a rural lawmaker who would be willing to join him as a co-sponsor.
Posted under Capitol Report.
Tags: Canada, cannibas, Cheech and Chong, Cisco McSorley, CNBC, Eric Holder, hemp, HR-1866, industrial hemp, marijuana, Ron Paul, THC, US Attorney General












8:24 am on November 19th, 2010
How stupid is our government? Maybe he should lobby all the Tobacco companies who are purchasing large tracks of land for when “pot” is legalized they will have lots of place to grow it.
5:43 pm on November 19th, 2010
You have to wonder how popular hemp production would be if it weren’t for the cachet of being illegal. Since the late 1800′s, hemp production throughout the world declined due to the discovery of cheaper and better alternatives. Current production estimates show a loss of $240 per acre. How is that going to help anyone?